Customer reviews and ratings

Had to redo twice to make the robe collar symmetric. Once done, the print quality was good.

A creased print from my wallet was refused. Reprinted from the original and it was fine.

The Canada portal complained about the background, not the file. Knowing the difference saved me a reshoot.

Print was fine. I only wish I had read the 45×60 versus 50×60 difference before ordering.

The 2:3 ratio felt unusually tall to me. It is correct, just very different from an ID photo crop.

The amount of headroom in a square crop looked wrong to me at first. It was correct — just unfamiliar.

The 400 dpi warning mattered — my previous studio file was only 300 dpi.

Photo passed, but the printed colour looked a bit warm vs the digital JPEG. Not enough for rejection though.

The uniform rule for US photos was new to me. Switched to everyday clothing and it went through.

Prepared four family photos in one session for a Malaga trip. All accepted at the Ankara centre.

Both file and print were accepted. The print looks a bit warm compared to studio-processed prints.

The scan and file were accepted, but the print looked a bit pale compared to what a studio produces.

File was accepted at CEAC. Print of the same file looked warmer than typical studio output but the consulate did not complain.

File accepted online but the physical print colour looked a bit different. Not critical since digital was primary.

Getting the head into ICAO 32-36 mm range required two attempts. Once done, print quality was good.

Officer accepted the file but the background looked slightly warm compared to a proper light-grey standard.

The photo itself is clean and got accepted, but the print stock feels a bit light. Not a problem for the file though.

Not clear at first that bangs cannot touch forehead. Retook with hair tied back — worked.

The Canadian file size limit had failed me twice before. Followed the note here and the portal accepted it immediately.

The chest-level crop advice fixed a photo where I was framed at the waist and looked very far away.

I read every guide here and found no contradictions between them. The same rule is stated the same way everywhere.

Clear warning that this cannot be used for an ID document. I only wanted it for a profile, so that was fine.

Honest page: it lists the discrimination argument against CV photos as well. That made the advice easier to trust.

Photo itself is fine and the branch accepted it. Shipping took 4 days to reach Antalya which was longer than promised.